Comment on Clegg – priority is patient not Party outcomes

In today’s Independent Nick Clegg has set out four demands for changes that will determine whether the Conservatives get the Lib Dems support for the Health Bill. We have the solutions….

Changes demanded by Clegg 

* “We must ensure that GPs only get involved in commissioning decisions once they are ready and willing” – Sensible really. Conscripts don’t make good volunteers but if PCTs are going, we can’t have a vacuum. Solutions are to put back the compulsory date or to assign them to an existing consortia. Either way, it’s right for GPs to be more accountable for their use of NHS resources.

* “The removal of any suggestion that we are pursuing a dogmatic obsession with competition [rather than] the best healthcare system in the world”. Absolutely – focus must be on the best known care and the safest possible delivery. This also means having humility and being open to competition as the evidence shows that it drives up quality.

* “Preventing the cherry-picking of services by private providers to make sure NHS providers are not needlessly pushed into financial trouble and NHS research and training can thrive” We need to recognise some facts here: who makes the decisions about where patients go for treatment? It’s the commissioners – not the private providers. The latter were key to Labour getting waiting lists down and now they’re being branded as imposters and source of instability. There are difficult decisions ahead about viability of NHS services based on safety, not just costs. And he’s right, we must encourage research and training, but that will also mean we need to keep the NICE mandate on access to medicines.

* “Enhancing governance and local accountability so decisions are transparent to all” Yes – and competition would enhance this. Shouldn’t we know what services our GP offers, what extra training they have had or awards they have been given and what they have done to assess the needs of their population? Then we will have the information to choose who we see – and Health and Wellbeing Boards should have a role here too, making sure commissioners are taking into consideration the wider determinants of health.

So on the whole, we agree with you Nick. And we understand that you need to look tough on the NHS, but don’t let your party forget the focus must be on patient not Party outcomes.

About Julia Manning

Julia is a social pioneer, writer and campaigner. She studied visual science at City University and became a member of the College of Optometrists in 1991, later specialising in visual impairment and diabetes. During her career in optometry, she lectured at City University, was a visiting clinician at the Royal Free Hospital and worked with Primary Care Trusts. She ran a domiciliary practice across south London and was a Director of the UK Institute of Optometry. Julia formed 20/20Health in 2006. Becoming an expert in digital health solutions, she led on the NHS–USA Veterans’ Health Digital Health Exchange Programme and was co-founder of the Health Tech and You Awards with Axa PPP and the Design Museum. Her research interests are now in harnessing digital to improve personal health, and she is a PhD candidate in Human Computer Interaction (HCI) at UCL. She is also dedicated to creating a sustainable Whole School Wellbeing Community model for schools that builds relationships, discovers assets and develops life skills. She is a member of the Royal Society of Medicine’s Digital Health Council. Julia has shared 2020health's research widely in the media (BBC News, ITV, Channel 5 News, BBC 1′s The Big Questions & Victoria Derbyshire, BBC Radio 4 Today, PM and Woman's Hour, LBC) and has taken part in debates and contributed to BBC’s Newsnight, Panorama, You and Yours and ITV’s The Week.
This entry was posted in competition, Health Bill and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Comment on Clegg – priority is patient not Party outcomes

  1. Pingback: Clegg may be soft-peddling on tackling competition in NHS bill | Left Foot Forward

    • I agree on removing competition push from monitor – it should focus on financial probity especially as more Foundation Trusts emerging with opaque accounts. One correction, I stood in 2005 not 2010.

  2. Pingback: The Daley (Half) Dozen: Friday | Pan Heads and Dead Heads Rock On

  3. Pingback: The Daley (Half) Dozen: Friday |

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s